ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
Serum visfatin in multiple sclerosis: distinct profiles in healthy controls, naive patients, and treated RRMS.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: This study aimed to evaluate serum visfatin levels in treated patients with Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS) (PwMS) receiving disease-modifying therapy (DMT) and in naive MS patients (nMS), and to investigate their association with clinical characteristics, treatment status, and disease activity, including NEDA-3 status. Methods: A total of 45 PwMS under treatment at least 1 year, 20 nMS patients, and 44 age- and sex-matched healthy controls (HC) were included. Clinical and demographic data were recorded. Serum visfatin, lipid profiles, inflammatory markers, and vitamin levels were measured. Visfatin levels were compared not only between treated and naive MS patients but also within the treated group according to NEDA-3 status and treatment type (first-line vs. second-line disease-modifying therapy). Statistical analyses were performed to assess group differences and correlations. Results: Visfatin levels differed significantly across the three groups (Kruskal-Wallis H = 19.701, p < 0.001). Pairwise comparisons revealed significant differences between all groups: the control group had higher visfatin levels than both the nMS (p < 0.001) and PwMS (p = 0.006). The treated group also showed higher visfatin levels compared to the naive MS group (p = 0.014). Among PwMS visfatin levels were lower than in healthy controls (p = 0.006). Among PwMS patients, those meeting the NEDA-3 criteria had lower visfatin levels and EDSS scores compared with non-NEDA patients (p = 0.008 and p = 0.006, respectively). No significant correlation was found between visfatin and relapse count or EDSS. LDL and total cholesterol levels were significantly higher in patients receiving fingolimod. Conclusion: Across the three groups, visfatin levels differed significantly, with healthy controls showing the highest levels, followed by PwwMS, and the lowest levels observed in nMS patients. Lower serum visfatin levels in stable treated MS patients may reflect reduced inflammatory burden and effective immunomodulation. These findings suggest that visfatin could serve as a potential biomarker for treatment response in MS. Nevertheless, longitudinal studies including larger cohorts of naive patients are needed to clarify visfatin's regulatory role in MS pathophysiology and its interaction with disease-modifying therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.