ArticleIndian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India
Surgical and functional outcomes of adrenalectomy by urologists: A 17-year cohort review.
Article in Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Impact of surgical start time on clinical outcomes in urologic surgery: a single-center study of major oncologic surgeries and adrenalectomy.World journal of urology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Incidental adrenal masses are found in up to 7% of all patients undergoing abdominal imaging. Data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program suggests that over 95% adrenalectomies are performed by general surgeons. To assess outcomes when surgeries are performed by urologists, we reviewed our database of adrenalectomies performed in the past 17 years. Methods: In this study, we reviewed our database of patients who underwent adrenalectomies between 2008 and 2024 in the department of urology. Clinical parameters were recorded for all patients, including their demographic profile, metabolic and radiological parameters, operative details, and complications. Outcomes were reported, and data for minimally invasive surgery were compared with those for open surgery (OS). Results: During the study period, 320 patients underwent 383 adrenalectomies, including 275 patients (85.9%) who had functional tumors, 69% of which were pheochromocytomas, 15.6% Cushing's syndrome, and 11.2% Conn's syndrome. Sixty-three patients had bilateral surgeries. Over 80% (260) patients had laparoscopic surgeries, and an additional 12 were robot-assisted. Six were converted to OS. The mean operative time (122.1 ± 58.3 min vs. 194.1 ± 76.4 min), median blood loss (100 mL vs. 350 mL), and median duration of hospital stay (3 vs. 5 days) were shorter for the minimally invasive approach. The overall complication rate was 6.5%. Conclusions: Adrenalectomy, including bilateral synchronous surgery, is a safe procedure that can be performed by urologists with excellent outcomes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.