Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41562009›Full record

ReviewIndian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India

Additional layer for better outcome in tubularized incised plate of hypospadias repair: Systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized control trials.

Arief Fadli Putra, Muhammad Sultan Ardhi Pratama Firdausy, Pandu Ishaq Nandana

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Arief Fadli PutraDepartment of Emergency, Bima Regional General Hospital, Bima, Indonesia.
Muhammad Sultan Ardhi Pratama FirdausyDepartment of Surgery, Division of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, West Nusa Tenggara Province Hospital, University of Mataram, Mataram, West Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia.
Pandu Ishaq NandanaDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, West Nusa Tenggara Province Hospital, University of Mataram, Mataram, West Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Hypospadias is a prevalent congenital defect of the male urethra, usually repaired using the tubularized incised plate (TIP) procedure. However, post-operative complications remain a challenge. Performing additional interventions have been proposed to reduce the risk of complications after TIP. Nonetheless, a comprehensive comparison of such interventions is limited. Methods: Systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) were conducted on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that reported the efficacy of additional layers or flaps in TIP. We performed Bayesian statistics incorporating random-effects modelling. The interventions were ranked based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). Results: This NMA of 22 RCTs involved a total of 1,994 pediatric patients. Multiple interventions may potentially reduce the rate of urethrocutaneous fistula (UCF), including the double dartos flap (DDF) (SUCRA 82.61%, [risk ratio (RR): 0.104, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.0189-0.321], absolute risk reduction (ARR): 13.74%), the tunica vaginalis flap (TVF) (SUCRA 60.19%, [RR: 0.295, 95% CI: 0.0766-0.784], ARR: 17.32%), and a combination of the tunica vaginalis with dartos fascia (TVF + SDF) (SUCRA 98.83%, [RR: 1.04 × 10 Conclusions: This NMA found that none of the interventions were definitively superior, especially for the secondary outcomes. However, DDF was found to be most successful in reducing the rate of UCF after TIP hypospadias repair. There is a need for further research, specifically in the realm of TVF, TVF + SDF, and autologous platelet derivatives. Also, head to head comparisons between interventions are strongly recommended.

Identifiers

PMID41562009
PMCPMC12815440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.