SynthesisFrontiers in psychiatry2025
Women's experiences with the healthcare system during and after a late miscarriage: a qualitative meta-synthesis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Miscarriage is a relatively common pregnancy outcome and often imposes a significant psychological burden on those affected. Previous research suggests that the role of the healthcare system can greatly influence the psychological consequences of a miscarriage. Several literature reviews have addressed women's experiences with the healthcare system in relation to early miscarriage. Late miscarriage, however, has received less attention in the research literature. The aim of this study was to synthesize qualitative literature on women's experiences with healthcare in relation to late miscarriage. Methods: The study is a qualitative meta-synthesis based on a systematic literature review conducted across four databases (CINAHL, Embase, Medline, and PsycInfo). Eight qualitative studies, comprising a total of 95 female participants, met the inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-synthesis. The data were analyzed using a meta-ethnographic approach. Results: The analysis identified three interconnected main themes that center on validating women's emotional and practical needs of the women: (1) Acknowledgment of the loss, (2) The power of language, and (3) Institutional factors. The women emphasized that healthcare professionals should recognize and validate their loss, demonstrate empathy and compassion and provide clear, comprehensible information delivered sensitively. Hospital facilities and other systemic factors also had a significant impact on how the women felt cared for and supported. Discussion: The study findings suggest areas for improving care and follow-up measures for those who experience late miscarriage. Further research on the topic could enhance understanding and contribute to the development of improved healthcare interventions for those affected. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier#CRD42024584350.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.