ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025
The Peking Health Anxiety Scale for Infectious Diseases: psychometric properties and short-form development.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Health anxiety can escalate rapidly during infectious disease outbreaks, yet existing assessment tools lack specificity for such contexts. This study aimed to develop and validate the Peking Health Anxiety Scale for Infectious Diseases (PHAID), a brief, context-sensitive measure tailored to infectious disease-related health anxiety. Methods: The PHAID was adapted from the Short Health Anxiety Inventory, with items revised to focus on COVID-19. Psychometric validation was conducted in a sample of 1,660 adults recruited primarily from the United States via Amazon's MTurk during the COVID-19 pandemic. Factor structure was determined using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Reliability, convergent and discriminant validity, and test-retest stability were assessed. A clinical cutoff and the relationship with preventive behaviors were examined. A 5-item short form (PHAID-S) was developed using Item Response Theory. Results: The PHAID demonstrated a stable two-factor structure (Catastrophic Thinking and Infection Worries), excellent internal consistency ( Conclusions: The PHAID and its short form provide reliable and valid tools for identifying infectious disease-related health anxiety. They show promise for supporting research and public health screening during outbreaks, though further validation in more diverse populations and clinical settings is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.