ArticleThe journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global2026
Evaluation of drug-induced lymphocyte stimulation test in mesalazine-associated allergic drug reaction.
Article in The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: 5-Aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) is a fundamental drug for UC management; however, adverse reactions can lead to poor clinical outcomes and increased health care costs. No objective tests currently exist to predict adverse reactions. This study thus investigated 5-ASA across 4 formulations and addressed a key issue in the treatment of mild to moderate ulcerative colitis (UC). Objective: We aimed to examine the utility of the drug-induced lymphocyte stimulation test (DLST) in predicting successful rotation from mesalazine to sulfasalazine (SASP) in patients with UC. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the largest cohort to date of patients with UC who were suspected of 5-ASA-associated adverse reactions and underwent DLST. We evaluated the DLST positivity rate for the suspected formulation, cross-reactivity to nonsuspected formulations, and clinical outcomes after rotation from mesalazine to SASP. Results: Mesalazine formulations exhibited a DLST positivity rate of 22.0% (18/82), with 45.1% (37/82) of patients testing positive for at least one 5-ASA formulation. Cross-reactivity between mesalazine and SASP was lower at 12.2% (10/82), likely because of structural differences. Adverse reactions typically developed within 2 weeks of initiating 5-ASA and commonly included fever, diarrhea, and bloody stool. Among patients with mesalazine-associated adverse reactions with DLST-negative test result for SASP, 8 of 12 tolerated the rotation. Rotation failure was mainly associated with a positive or borderline DLST result for mesalazine. Conclusions: DLST serves as a useful diagnostic tool for guiding treatment in patients with UC and suspected 5-ASA-associated hypersensitivity reactions. Prospective multicenter studies are needed to validate its clinical utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.