Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41561963›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in medicine2025

Integrating neuropsychoanalytic and neuropsychiatric perspectives into psychiatric clinical neuroscience curricula: a conceptual overview.

Edward Miller, Michael Weightman, Andrew Amos, Steven Yeates, Fiona Wilkes

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Edward MillerDivision of Psychological Medicine, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Michael WeightmanDiscipline of Psychiatry, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Andrew AmosSchool of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, Australia.
Steven YeatesAustralian Psychoanalytical Society, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Fiona WilkesAcademic Unit of Psychiatry and Addiction Medicine, The Australian National University School of Medicine and Psychology, Canberra, ACT, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Neuropsychoanalysis and neuropsychiatry are two rapidly advancing fields that can provide valuable additions to a clinical neuroscience curriculum in psychiatry and strengthen psychiatrists' psychotherapeutic training and practice. Methods: This article provides an overview of key concepts of neuropsychoanalysis and neuropsychiatry, noting their common history in neurology, psychiatry and psychoanalysis. Several case vignettes are also provided to demonstrate how these concepts could be used to better understand specific psychiatric presentations. Results: Key concepts discussed include the shared history of neuropsychoanalysis and neuropsychiatry; philosophy of mind; the neuroscientific basis and function of different levels of consciousness; affective neuroscience; and the hierarchical network function of the brain. Conclusion: Neuropsychoanalysis and neuropsychiatry are subspecialties that have made important clinical and theoretical contributions to psychiatry. These insights could be used to inform the ongoing development of contemporary psychiatric clinical neuroscience curricula. Relevance to clinical practice: Psychiatrists can use this article to help with "bedside teaching" of junior staff, assist with patient formulation and psychoeducation, and ultimately inform an integrated pedagogical framework for the clinical training of psychiatrists.

Indexed as

clinical neurosciencemedical educationneuropsychiatryneuropsychoanalysispsychiatry training

Identifiers

PMID41561963
PMCPMC12812583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.