Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41561855›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

The impact of the work organization on individuals' psychological well-being.

Elisabetta Riccardi, Veruscka Leso, Luca Fontana, Fabio Fusco, Mariagaia Coppola, Daniela Pacella, Ivo Iavicoli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Elisabetta Riccardi *Department of Public Health, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
Veruscka Leso *Department of Public Health, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
Luca FontanaDepartment of Public Health, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
Fabio FuscoDepartment of Public Health, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
Mariagaia CoppolaDepartment of Public Health, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
Daniela PacellaDepartment of Public Health, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
Ivo IavicoliDipartimento di Sicurezza e Bioetica, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This study explored the psychological well-being (PWB) of workers engaged in two distinct occupational settings, the transport and instruction sectors, to understand how different work arrangements (on-site, remote, and hybrid) affect workers' PWB. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted from October 2020 to December 2021, involving employees of a transport company (427), primarily engaged in on-site tasks and University workers (445) involved in remote activities. The PWB was assessed using the Psychological General Well-Being Index. Results: A general global satisfactory PWB was demonstrated in both groups. However, transport workers showed significantly better results compared to the University personnel, both at the global level (mean ± standard deviation: 87 ± 9 vs. 72 ± 14, respectively) as well as in the anxiety, depression, positive well-being, self-control, general health and vitality sub-dimensions. Age was negatively associated with the PWB among transport workers ( Conclusion: The type of work organization and individual characteristics may significantly influence workers' PWB perception. These findings suggest the need for tailored interventions specifically focused on workload and the specific challenges as well as the needs for different occupational groups (e.g., women, older employees, and remote workers) to promote individuals' well-being in an evolving world of work.

Indexed as

Psychological Well-BeingTransportationWorkplaceAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesWorking Conditionsfuture of workoccupational healthon-site workpsychological well-beingremote work

Identifiers

PMID41561855
PMCPMC12813163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.