ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Gender-neutral human papillomavirus vaccination: an equitable and cost-effective public health investment.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human papillomavirus (HPV) drives a substantial cancer burden across all genders. This perspective argues that gender-neutral HPV vaccination is an equitable and cost-effective public health investment when designed for scale. Rather than presenting methods in detail, we synthesize recent epidemiology, policy positions, and economic evaluations to propose a simplicity-first pathway-a pragmatic model that, where permitted, prioritizes single-dose schedules, school-based delivery for adolescents aged 9-14, small, computable set of key performance indicators (KPIs) set (coverage, timeliness, series completion, and equity gaps), routine adverse events following immunization (AEFI) monitoring, and phased expansion as system capacity grows. The simplicity-first pathway advances global equity by protecting boys and girls alike, reducing stigma, and delivering both direct and indirect benefits to underserved groups, including sexual minority populations. In resource-constrained settings, single-dose policies (where adopted), integration with existing school-based platforms, and pooled multi-year procurement can reduce delivery complexity and improve value for money. Cost-effectiveness remains context-specific and is sensitive to vaccine price, achievable coverage, and which outcomes are included in the analysis. Policy implications: Countries should strongly consider gender-neutral vaccination as the default program design to accelerate population-level protection and close avoidable equity gaps, while adapting schedules and financing to national regulations, fiscal space, and information-system readiness. This simplicity-first framing offers a practical bridge between policy intent and sustainable routine implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.