ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Beyond the gift: donor motivations and family experiences as drivers of body donation programs.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Body donation to science provides indispensable resources for medical education and research, yet shortages remain widespread. Understanding the interplay between donor motivations and family experiences is essential to sustain donation programs and to position them as public health education initiatives. Methods: We conducted Results: Scientific utility was the leading motivation (56.7%), followed by symbolic meaning, altruism, and gratitude. Nearly all donors informed their relatives (96.2%), whose reactions varied by occupational category. Families expressed overall satisfaction but frequently described a "double bereavement" at death and at restitution. Word-of-mouth was the predominant channel of information (52.9%), though many respondents called for broader outreach. Within the PMT framework, donation was driven by high perceived response efficacy, reinforced self-efficacy (accessible information, family dialogue), and limited but salient emotional costs. Prosocial and altruistic factors (empathy, responsibility, symbolic legacy) complemented protective motivations, framing donation as a costly yet meaningful prosocial act. Discussion: Integrating PMT and prosociality provides a novel model to explain why donation simultaneously addresses a perceived systemic shortage (protective motive) and a desire to contribute to the common good (altruistic motive). Family support functions as a key moderator, amplifying motivation and reducing perceived costs. Within the BCW, interventions should enhance capability (clear communication, bereavement support), expand opportunity (media campaigns, standardized rituals, faculty presence), and sustain motivation (student/educator testimonials, family recognition). Conclusion: Body donation programs extend beyond logistics: they act as population-level health education and promotion initiatives, normalizing dialogue on death, solidarity, and legacy. Embedding integrative behavioral models into program design can strengthen institutional trust, support families, and ensure the sustainability of body donation worldwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.