ArticleMachine Learning. Health2026
Artificial intelligence (AI)-based multi-organ contour quality assurance with uncertainty estimation for online adaptive radiotherapy (oART).
Article in Machine Learning. Health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate delineation of treatment targets and organs at risk (OARs) is essential to the success of radiotherapy (RT). Although artificial intelligence (AI)-based segmentation methods have successfully automated the delineation process, a reliable and efficient quality assurance (QA) mechanism is still missing, particularly in the time-critical setting of online adaptive RT (oART). This study aims to address this unmet clinical need by introducing an AI-driven multi-organ contour QA framework with uncertainty quantification. Using MR-guided oART for prostate cancer as the testbed, we developed an automatic multi-structure QA framework by employing a carefully designed contour quality estimation (ConQuE) model. Built on a ResNet34 backbone, ConQuE processes binary segmentation masks with corresponding MR images to classify contours as 'acceptable' or 'revision required' in a slice-by-slice manner. To ensure scalability, we proposed a unified framework for multi-organ QA by embedding structure-specific code into the fully connected layers. To quantify classification uncertainty, Monte Carlo (MC) dropout was employed, enabling confidence assessment of model predictions for informative decision-making in oART. ConQuE was trained to assess the segmentation quality of prostate and six OARs, including rectum, bladder, urethra, penile bulb, cauda equina, and femoral heads. Training was performed using 249 cases for training, 31 for validation, and another 31 cases were saved for testing. With 30 MC dropout passes, ConQuE can complete QA for one image slice in ∼13.1 ms. Overall, ConQuE achieved accuracy of 93.9% on all structures with structure-specific performance consistently above 90%, demonstrating its strong capability in identifying
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.