ArticleEuropean heart journal. Case reports2026
Unexpected acute kidney injury requiring dialysis after routine pulsed field pulmonary vein isolation: a case report.
Article in European heart journal. Case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Optimized workflow for pentaspline PFA and its impact on PVI durability: evidence from systematic remapping.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using pulsed field ablation (PFA) has emerged as a promising treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF). However, haemolysis-induced acute kidney injury (AKI) remains a concern, particularly with higher numbers of applications. Case summary: We report the case of a 62-year-old male with a history of CABG who underwent PVI using a 35 mm pentaspline PFA catheter. Pre-procedural CT imaging revealed a large 37 mm left common PV ostium. Standard energy delivery protocols were followed, including two 'olive' applications per vein. The patient was discharged the same day. That evening, he developed dark 'cola-coloured' urine. Upon remote consultation the next day, he was advised to increase fluid intake to 3 L that day. His urine colour normalized by the following day, but he experienced a 3 kg weight gain and oliguria and presented to the emergency department. Laboratory tests showed severe AKI (eGFR to 6 mL/min/1.73 m²), necessitating urgent dialysis. Laboratory results showed modest but clinically relevant elevation of haemolysis markers, while urine analysis showed breakdown product of erythrocytes. After several haemodialysis sessions, the patient's urine output improved, and he was eventually discharged. Two months after the procedure, his renal function recovered to normal values. Discussion: While prior experience suggests that limiting PFA applications to fewer than 70 may reduce the risk of haemolysis-associated renal injury, this case demonstrates that even with 40 applications and minimal systemic haemolysis, AKI requiring dialysis can occur. This highlights the need for heightened vigilance, early fluid management, and prompt intervention to support renal recovery after PFA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.