Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41561727›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine2025

A Prospective Study of the Epidemiological Profile of Dog Bite Cases and Determinants of Anti-Rabies Vaccination Compliance at a Rural Health Training Center from a Medical College in Gujarat.

Rashmi Sharma, Shailesh Prajapati, Harsh Bakshi, Brijesh Patel, Azbah Pirzada, Nirav Bapat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rashmi SharmaDepartment of Community Medicine, GMERS Medical College, Sola Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
Shailesh PrajapatiDepartment of Community Medicine, GMERS Medical College, Sola Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
Harsh BakshiDepartment of Community Medicine, GMERS Medical College, Sola Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
Brijesh PatelDepartment of Community Medicine, GMERS Medical College, Sola Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
Azbah PirzadaDepartment of Community Medicine, GMERS Medical College, Sola Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
Nirav BapatDepartment of Community Medicine, GMERS Medical College, Sola Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: India is endemic for rabies, the most dreaded complication of animal bites which accounts for 35-40% of the world's rabies cases. The Anti-Rabies Vaccine (ARV) is the only proven way to prevent deaths due to rabies; however, its compliance is still a matter of concern. This study was conducted with objectives to (1) generate the epidemiological profile of dog bite cases and (2) assess the determinants of ARV compliance. Methodology: A prospective study was conducted at a Primary Health Centre (PHC), also the RHTC of a medical college in Ahmedabad, Gujarat. All consecutive incident cases of animal bite registered at RHTC between May-Dec 2023 were included and followed for 60 days (post-bite). All cases, whether ARV compliant or not were approached by home visits or telephonic meetings. Data were collected using a pre-designed semi-structured questionnaire. Results: There were 221 cases of dog bites. Most involved were stray dogs 175 (79.2%). Bites occurred more in public places (75.1%), during the evening and early night hours, accounting for 42.5% of cases with a peak during September-November (45.2%). As for the treatment-seeking pattern, 40.7% did not do anything at home. Maximum cases were from category II 58.4%, followed by 30.3% and 11.3% cases from categories I and III. ARV was indicated in 196 cases; 121 (61.7%) of them fully complied with ARV. Reasons for non/poor compliance were feeling cured, being out of the station, and a lack of specific reasons. Important compliance determinants were the occupation of the case and the status of the animal vaccination. Conclusion: Only 61.7% of cases had complete ARV compliance, highlighting compliance issues and the necessity of community-based awareness campaigns that emphasize wound care and ARV schedule completion.

Indexed as

Compliance and determinants of ARVdog biteprospective study

Identifiers

PMID41561727
PMCPMC12815367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.