ReviewIndian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine2025
Advancements in Cancer Survival Prediction: A Systematic Review of Classical and Modern Approaches.
Review in Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The unpredictable nature of cancer, along with the absence of noticeable symptoms, makes it essential to accurately predict patient survival in order to enhance treatment results. Conventional approaches often struggle with the complexity of cancer. As digitization continues to grow, advanced machine learning and deep learning models are increasingly used to improve survival predictions. This paper aims to identify the survival analysis models applied in cancer prediction, highlight recent advancements, and suggest directions for future research. A literature search was conducted using three databases: ScienceDirect, IEEE Xplore, and PubMed. Boolean search strategies were used to locate relevant studies published in the last 15 years. The PRISMA guidelines were followed to review and select articles based on predefined inclusion criteria. This review critically examines 51 articles, focusing on the transition from traditional statistical methods to more advanced machine learning techniques. The findings show a growing trend towards using clinical data, even when the data sets are limited, and an increasing interest in hybrid and deep learning models for survival prediction. While traditional machine learning methods still hold a majority, the potential of deep learning and integrated techniques is gaining wider recognition. The findings emphasize the need for improved machine learning approaches to achieve more accurate survival predictions and encourage further research into deep learning models. It offers valuable insights for researchers at all levels, providing an overview of current methods and potential areas for future exploration in cancer survival analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.