ReviewCureus2026
Neurological Complications Associated With COVID-19 Compared to Other Viral Infections: A Systematic Review of Current Evidence.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neurological complications have become one of the most concerning features of COVID-19, yet clinicians still lack a clear comparison between these findings and what is seen in other viral infections. Understanding where SARS-CoV-2 fits, whether it behaves like influenza and dengue or follows an entirely different pattern, is essential for diagnosis, management, and planning long-term care. We conducted a systematic review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines (PROSPERO: CRD420251064831). Searches across PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science (2000-2025) identified 24 eligible studies, including observational cohorts, clinical trials, case series, autopsy work, and national surveillance data. Because of the wide variation in study design and reporting, a narrative synthesis was used. Across the 24 studies, COVID-19 exhibited the widest and most severe spectrum of neurological involvement. Reported central nervous system complications included ischemic stroke, encephalopathy or encephalitis, seizures, and extensive microglial and white-matter injury in fatal cases. Peripheral complications were also prominent, such as anosmia, demyelinating neuropathies, Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, functional movement disorders, and persistent abnormalities on nerve conduction testing long after recovery. In contrast, neurological complications from influenza were less frequent and mostly involved encephalitis/encephalopathy, seizures, meningitis, GBS, or myelitis, with generally low mortality. Dengue virus has been associated with a spectrum of direct neurotropic effects and immune-mediated syndromes, including encephalitis, GBS, myelitis, brachial neuritis, and myositis. Most patients recovered, and mortality remained low. Compared with influenza and dengue, COVID-19 stands out for both the breadth and severity of its neurological manifestations, as well as the persistence of symptoms in many survivors. These findings highlight the need for early neurological evaluation in COVID-19, structured follow-up after recovery, and more consistent research methods to allow better comparisons across viral infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.