SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2025
The biomechanics of piano playing: a systematic review of kinematic, kinetic, and electromyographic literature.
Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Biomimetic Dexterous Hand Control for Robotic Piano Playing Using a Two-Stage Reinforcement Learning Curriculum.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Piano playing is one of the most complex human activities, involving an intricate interplay between the cognitive, neural, and musculoskeletal systems. Understanding the biomechanics of piano playing could have important implications for evidence-based pedagogy, optimizing skill acquisition, increasing practice efficiency, and minimizing the risk of performance-related injuries. This systematic review synthesizes existing literature in piano biomechanics. A comprehensive search across five databases (MEDLINE, PsycINFO, SCOPUS, Music Index, and ERIC) yielded 7,671 studies, of which 53 met inclusion criteria. These studies utilized kinematic, kinetic, and electromyographic measurements during piano performance under varying task conditions, including isolated keystrokes, novel excerpts, self-selected repertoire, and standard piano literature. The results were synthesized to address (1) how variations in pianistic technique (e.g., type of touch, finger independence) influence kinematics, kinetics, and muscle activation, and (2) how task demands (e.g., tempo, loudness), and performance demands (e.g., fatigue, ergonomics) affect pianists' biomechanical characteristics. Together, current biomechanical evidence indicates that touch type, finger independence, intersegmental kinematics, and muscular activation are modulated by pianists' skill level, anthropometry, task demands, and muscular fatigue. We further discuss and link the existing literature to pedagogy, practice, and performance, thereby demonstrating that biomechanical parameters are not merely abstract descriptors of motion but are integral to pedagogy, musical expression, and sustainable performance. While there is an accumulating wealth of biomechanical data involving piano playing, its integration into standardized pedagogy remains limited. Interdisciplinary collaboration in piano biomechanics is therefore essential to advance our understanding of musical expression, communication, and wellbeing, ultimately supporting the development of sustainable playing techniques that can be effectively translated into pedagogical frameworks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.