Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41561597›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

The scenicness of historic buildings rivals that of natural features: evidence from crowdsourced photographs of English urban areas.

Sidney Sherborne, Eugene Malthouse

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sidney SherborneDepartment of Psychology, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Eugene MalthouseCentre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spending time in more scenic areas is associated with better health and wellbeing, making it important to understand how scenicness is influenced by environmental features. Urban areas, where natural features have often been replaced by buildings, are generally perceived as less scenic than rural ones. However, historic architecture may enhance urban scenicness. Using data from Historic England and Scenic-or-Not, a crowdsourced platform rating the scenicness of UK photographs, we investigate the relationship between listed buildings (as recorded on the National Heritage List for England) and scenicness. We find that the presence of a listed building in a photograph of an urban scene is associated with a 0.61-point increase in scenicness on a 10-point scale (equivalent to 0.53 standard deviations). This association is comparable to that of forests and lakes and is greater for buildings designated as more significant, listed earlier, and dating from earlier periods. These findings highlight the positive contribution of historic buildings to urban environments and provide empirical support for their continued preservation as public goods.

Indexed as

historic buildingslisted buildingsnatural beautyscenicnessurban areas

Identifiers

PMID41561597
PMCPMC12812532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.