Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41561592›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Exploring Chinese middle-class parents' challenges and coping strategies of dialogic reading in a digital EFL context.

Lili Zhao, Xiangli Cai, Limin Qin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lili ZhaoEnglish Department, University of Jinan, Jinan, China.
Xiangli CaiSchool of Culture and Communication, Shandong University at Weihai, Weihai, China.
Limin QinEnglish Department, University of Jinan, Jinan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Against the backdrop of English learning enthusiasm in China, many Chinese parents are using digital storybooks to support their children's early English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learning. While previous research has demonstrated the benefits of dialogic reading of digital storybooks, the challenges parents encounter in a non-native English speaking context are under-explored. Methods: Employing parent-child reading videotaped recordings, reflective journals, and semi-structured interviews, this qualitative study collected data from 18 Chinese parent-child dyads over 8 weeks. Thematic analysis was used to explore parents' challenges and coping strategies in dialogic reading. Results: The findings demonstrated that Chinese middle-class parents experienced two major challenges. Parent-related challenges were characterized by the self-limitation of the communicative MKO role, a conflict between high cognitive load and strategy mastery, and time constraints. Child-related challenges stemmed from a mismatch between the child's ZPD and dialogic strategy demands, as well as attention competition in the digital environment. In response, parents utilized self-scaffolding to equip themselves as competent MKOs. Furthermore, the parents and the digital English storybooks jointly provided dual scaffolding for children's reading and English language acquisition. Discussion: By exploring these challenges and coping strategies, this study extends Sociocultural Theory by expanding the concepts of the MKO and Scaffolding in the digital EFL context. It also provides practical insights for parental training, dialogic reading implementation and the design of digital storybook Apps.

Indexed as

Chinese middle-class parentscoping strategiesdialogic readingdigital storybooksparental challenges

Identifiers

PMID41561592
PMCPMC12812999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.