ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Relative age selection bias does not translate into a playing-time advantage: evidence from Italian Serie A football.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Relative age effect and development pathways in French basketball: from youth training structures to senior national teams.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Article
- "It was clear from his childhood that he was destined to be a top striker": investigating the construction of football talent narratives in the Italian sporting press.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The Relative Age Effects (RAEs) represent a bias in talent identification and selection processes, favouring athletes born earlier in the selection year. This study aimed to (i) quantify the prevalence and magnitude of the RAEs in Italian elite football (Serie A), considering age categories, playing positions, and team ranking, and (ii) examine whether RAEs are associated with selection- and participation-related outcomes (i.e., match appearances, total playing time, and consistency of match participation). Methods: Data from 789 Serie A players were analysed. Results: Q1 players were overrepresented compared with Q4 players (OR=1.9 [1.5-2.6]). RAEs were more pronounced in younger players (OR=2.1 [1.4-3.2]) and more evident among goalkeepers (OR=4.4 [1.8-10.6]) followed by forwards (OR=2.0 [1.0-3.8]), midfielders (OR=1.9 [1.1-3.1]) and defenders (OR=1.6 [1.0-2.4]). Moreover, RAEs were stronger in lower-tier teams (OR=2.5 [1.4-4.5]) than in top-tier teams (OR=1.5 [0.8-2.7]). No differences were observed between quartiles in selection- and participation-related outcomes. Discussion: RAEs persist in Serie A rosters but appear to operate primarily as a selection-level bias within talent development and squad selection, affecting which players reach and remain at the elite level, rather than influencing coaches' decisions regarding match participation once players are part of the professional environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.