Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41561577›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

The impact of accompaniment on the training and competencies of psychology students for clinical practice: a quasi-experimental study.

Karla Gallo-Giunzioni, Agata Kasprzak, Elvira Santiago

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Karla Gallo-GiunzioniFaculty of Education and Psychology, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria, Madrid, Spain.
Agata KasprzakFaculty of Education and Psychology, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria, Madrid, Spain.
Elvira SantiagoFaculty of Education and Psychology, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Training in psychology requires not only theoretical knowledge but also the development of practical competencies for intervention in healthcare settings. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a teaching innovation program based on simulated contexts under the accompaniment and supervision of a qualified instructor, designed to strengthen competencies essential for future professional practice. Methods: A program was implemented based on the practical application of intervention and assessment tools in simulated clinical settings. A pre-post design was used with 135 third-year psychology students over two academic years (2023-2024 and 2024-2025), of whom 111 were women (82.2%) and 24 men (17.8%) (N Results: The results showed significant improvements in all evaluated competencies except for teamwork, possibly due to the limited duration of the program and minimal collaborative interaction among participants. Discussion: Expert supervision and accompaniment appear to be key factors in competence development. This innovative approach reinforces the integration of theory and practice in psychological training and offers a replicable methodology to optimize experiential learning.

Indexed as

accompanimentclinical supervisioncompetencieseducational innovationpsychology

Identifiers

PMID41561577
PMCPMC12813041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.