Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41561569›Full record

ArticleCase reports in obstetrics and gynecology2026

False Alarm: When Dropped Gallstones Mimic Malignant Recurrence. A Case Report and Literature Review.

Nedaa Obeidi, Michael Egan, Michael E Kelly, Feras Abu Saadeh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Case reports in obstetrics and gynecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nedaa ObeidiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland, tcd.ie.
Michael EganDepartment of Surgery and Anesthesia, Hermitage Medical Clinin, Dublin, Ireland.
Michael E KellyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland, tcd.ie.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0757-6411
Feras Abu SaadehDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland, tcd.ie.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9598-8650

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dropped gallstones are a known complication of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, occurring in up to 40% of cases. While often considered benign, they can lead to complications like abscess formation and peritoneal adhesions. In cancer patients, dropped gallstones may mimic disease recurrence, leading to unnecessary diagnostic procedures and patient distress. We report the case of a 63-year-old woman with a history of leiomyosarcoma, previously treated with surgical resection. She subsequently underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Ten months later, she presented with nonspecific upper abdominal symptoms, and imaging indicated peritoneal nodularity suspicious for malignancy. A CT-guided biopsy was inconclusive, prompting diagnostic laparoscopy revealing multiple dropped gallstones with granulomatous inflammation but no evidence of malignancy. The patient remained symptoms free after retrieval, with no further radiological abnormalities on follow-up imaging. This case highlights the diagnostic challenges posed by dropped gallstones, particularly in oncology patients where they can be mistaken for peritoneal metastases. Surgeons should be meticulous to retrieve all gallstones during laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and radiologists should include dropped gallstones in the differential diagnosis of new intra-abdominal lesions in postsurgical patients. Awareness of this phenomenon can prevent unnecessary interventions and patient anxiety.

Identifiers

PMID41561569
PMCPMC12813406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.