ReviewEcancermedicalscience2025
eHealth tools to improve the health-related quality of life of family caregivers of cancer patients in developing countries: a systematic review protocol.
Review in Ecancermedicalscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: ehealth improves the health-related quality of life for cancer patients and their families by providing easier access to medical information, promoting self-management, and providing personalised care through digital platforms. However, there is still a dearth of comprehensive understanding of their influences in developing countries. Objectives: To identify several ehealth interventions accessible to family caregivers of people with cancer in developing countries and to assess the impact of these interventions on their health-related quality of life. Methods: The review will adhere to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols. Health databases and search engines, including PubMed, Medline via Ovid, Embase via Ovid, and CINAHL via EBSCOhost, will be used. We will include quantitative or mixed method research evaluating e-health, with a particular emphasis on the health-related quality of life of family caregivers of cancer patients. Studies from developing countries, including peer-reviewed journals and grey literature, will be considered without regard to publication date.The study selection process involves screening titles and abstracts for relevance, then, doing a full-text assessment against the inclusion criteria. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for randomised controlled trials and ROBINS-I V2 for non-randomised studies will be employed to assess the quality of the included studies. The A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews will assess the quality of this systematic review. Implications: This review offers a thorough and impartial summary of current research on e-health tools and their impact on the health-related quality of life of family caregivers of cancer patients. It seeks to inform evidence-based decision-making across healthcare, policy development, and research design by identifying knowledge gaps, emphasising areas requiring further investigation, and steering future research. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42024622302 https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024622302.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.