Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41561494›Full record

ArticleInterventional pain medicine2026

S1 foraminal neuroplasty using a reference spinal needle. A technical note.

Victor M Silva-Ortiz, Anna Gisse López-Uribe, Sergio A Pozo-Flores, Christopher L Robinson

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Interventional pain medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Victor M Silva-OrtizDepartment of Pain Management, Hospital Angeles Valle Oriente, San Pedro Garza García, Nuevo León, Mexico.
Anna Gisse López-UribeDepartment of Pain Management, Hospital MAC, Los Mochis Sinaloa, Mexico.
Sergio A Pozo-FloresPain Clinic, La Paz, Baja California Sur, Mexico.
Christopher L RobinsonDepartment of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Harvard Medical School-Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Radicular pain may originate from various etiologies, among which epidural fibrosis is a significant contributor. Epidural scarring can induce pain through multiple pathophysiological mechanisms, notably by entrapping spinal nerve roots and disrupting the integrity of the myelin sheath. Objective: To present a safe and practical technique for performing neuroplasty via the S1 foramen, utilizing a Tuohy or introducer needle guided by a reference spinal needle under fluoroscopic imaging. This caudal-to-cephalic approach ensures precise catheter advancement and builds upon previously described methods by Silva et al. Design: Technical note. Methods: For the described approach, we considered the anatomical dimensions of the sacral canal, with particular attention to the measurements at the level of the S1 foramen. This measurement is crucial, as it determines the available space for positioning the introducer needle and safely advancing the neuroplasty catheter in a caudal-to-cephalic direction. Conclusion: This technique enables safer and more effective S1 foraminal neuroplasty by incorporating depth information through the use of reference spinal needles under fluoroscopic guidance. It facilitates tunnel-view access, which was previously unattainable, and improves procedural outcomes, particularly benefiting clinicians with less experience in fluoroscopically guided interventions.

Indexed as

Epidural fibrosisNeuroplastyRadicular painS1 posterior foramen

Identifiers

PMID41561494
PMCPMC12814671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.