Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41561475›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in toxicology2025

Comparative assessment of solvents toxicity using early life stages of amphibians and cell lines: a case study with dimethyl sulfoxide.

Sónia Dias Coelho, Diana Campos, Mónica Almeida, Carla Quintaneiro, Miguel Oliveira, Isabel Lopes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in toxicology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sónia Dias CoelhoCentre for Environmental and Marine Studies (CESAM) and Department of Biology, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal.
Diana CamposCentre for Environmental and Marine Studies (CESAM) and Department of Biology, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal.
Mónica AlmeidaCentre for Environmental and Marine Studies (CESAM) and Department of Biology, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal.
Carla QuintaneiroCentre for Environmental and Marine Studies (CESAM) and Department of Biology, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal.
Miguel OliveiraCentre for Environmental and Marine Studies (CESAM) and Department of Biology, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal.
Isabel LopesCentre for Environmental and Marine Studies (CESAM) and Department of Biology, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The reduction in the number of animals being used in experimental assays has been a concern of the scientific community. In this sense, non-animal alternative methods have been increasingly tested. This study intended to explore how cell-based responses compare to organismal outcomes and if the former models could contribute to minimizing the number of live animals needed in subsequent stages of hazard/risk assessment of chemicals on amphibians. For this, the toxicity of the commonly used solvent dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) was assessed in early life stages (embryos and tadpoles) of two anuran species (

Indexed as

amphibian ecotoxicologyanurahazard assessmentIn vitro methodsnon-animal alternatives

Identifiers

PMID41561475
PMCPMC12812705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.