Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41561405›Full record

ReviewEClinicalMedicine2026

Exploring the effects of pharmacological treatments on suicidality in children and adolescents: a structured review of the literature and narrative synthesis.

Andrea Amerio, Enrico Venturini, Mirko Capanna, Luca Ploner, Irene Schiavetti, Alessandra Costanza, Massimiliano Clausi, Paola Bertuccio, Anna Odone, Helen Minnis and 6 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EClinicalMedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Andrea AmerioDepartment of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DINOGMI), Section of Psychiatry, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Enrico VenturiniDepartment of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DINOGMI), Section of Psychiatry, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Mirko CapannaDepartment of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DINOGMI), Section of Psychiatry, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Luca PlonerDepartment of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DINOGMI), Section of Psychiatry, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Irene SchiavettiIRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.
Alessandra CostanzaDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University (UNIGE), Geneva, Switzerland.
Massimiliano ClausiUniversità degli Studi Guglielmo Marconi, Rome, Italy.
Paola BertuccioSchool of Public Health, Department of Public Health, Experimental and Forensic Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Anna OdoneSchool of Public Health, Department of Public Health, Experimental and Forensic Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Helen MinnisSchool of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Ruchika GajwaniSchool of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Renato de FilippisPsychiatry Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University Magna Graecia of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.
Pasquale De FazioPsychiatry Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University Magna Graecia of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.
Mario AmoreDepartment of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DINOGMI), Section of Psychiatry, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Andrea AgugliaDepartment of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DINOGMI), Section of Psychiatry, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Gianluca SerafiniDepartment of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DINOGMI), Section of Psychiatry, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Suicide rates have risen among young people, making it a leading cause of adolescent death worldwide. Although several pharmacological treatments have been approved in the context of definite underlying conditions, their broader efficacy in reducing suicidality remains unclear. Methods: A structured review was conducted on pharmacological treatments for suicidality in under 18s. PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Library were searched from inception to 31 July 2025. Eligible studies included patients <18 years with suicidality treated with antidepressants, mood stabilisers, or antipsychotics. Exclusion criteria were non-pharmacological interventions, non-suicidal self-injury-only studies, reviews, and grey literature. Both interventional and observational designs were considered. Four authors independently screened, extracted, and appraised data using Joanna Briggs Institute tools. The primary outcome was suicidality reduction, synthesised narratively. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42024548628. Findings: Twenty-three articles out of 1747 met inclusion criteria, totalling 2235 participants. Risk of bias across studies was low-to-moderate for nearly all studies (22/23). However, the majority employed weaker study designs and targeted underlying diagnoses, with suicidality rarely assessed as a primary outcome. Esketamine (four studies, Interpretation: Evidence remains scarce and heterogeneous. Esketamine and lithium appear promising for acute and chronic suicidality, respectively. Further high-quality studies investigating suicidal thoughts and behaviours as independent treatment targets are needed to guide clinical decision-making. Funding: None.

Indexed as

Pharmacological treatmentsSuicidalityUnder 18s

Identifiers

PMID41561405
PMCPMC12814428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.