ArticleAmerican heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice2026
Coronary artery calcium score of zero does not rule out obstructive CAD in young adults.
Article in American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Ischemic Risk in Patients with Zero Coronary Artery Calcium Undergoing Stress PET/CT Testing.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Young adults are more likely to have non-calcified coronary plaques. Purpose to assess the predictive value of a zero-coronary artery calcium (CAC) score in young adults and to determine which clinical characteristics are associated with obstructive coronary heart disease. Methods: 6775 patients were prospectively entered a registry. They all had a CAC. Mean age 63 +/- 18 years. 56.2 % males. 3525 patients underwent coronary CT angiography (CCTA). 3250 patients underwent single photon emission tomography (SPECT). SPECT patients were mainly outpatients. CCTA patients also were almost exclusively outpatients. Thus, the population was generally a low-risk population. Results: Among the CCTA patients, 1888 had a 0 CAC score. 175/1888 (9 %) had less than 70 % stenosis, while 41/1888 (2.2 %) had ≥70 % stenosis. Patients with ≥70 % stenosis: were younger 45 ± 12 yr versus 59 ± 11 yr, Conclusions: A zero CAC does not rule out significant CAD in young adults with chest pain with CAD risk factors. These patients may need further investigations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.