ArticleTrauma surgery & acute care open2026
Effect of high elevation on deep vein thrombosis: a multicenter cohort study.
Article in Trauma surgery & acute care open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Higher calling: impact of elevation on deep venous thrombosis.Trauma surgery & acute care open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Prior research explored the effect of elevation on deep vein thrombosis (DVT) but primarily examined injuries at elevations <1000 or >4000 feet, excluding elevations in between, and focused on specific subsets of trauma patients. This study aimed to conduct a more detailed analysis of the relationship between elevation and DVT in all trauma admissions. Methods: This retrospective cohort study at four level I trauma centers included adult trauma patients (October 1, 2022 to October 1, 2023). Injury zip codes were used to define elevation. High-elevation (H-ELV) injuries (≥5000 feet) were compared with low-elevation (L-ELV) injuries (<5000 feet). Elevation was further categorized into 1000-foot increments. An alpha of <0.0001 defined statistical significance. Results: Of 8620 patients, 49% (4231) had L-ELV injuries and 51% (4389) had H-ELV injuries. Compared to patients with L-ELV injuries, those with H-ELV injuries were significantly older, had lower oxygen saturation and higher heart rate, suffered falls and sports injuries more often, and motor vehicle collisions less often, and had a higher rate of comorbidities, including alcohol use disorder and anticoagulant use. DVTs occurred significantly more often after H-ELV injuries than L-ELV injuries (1.9% vs. 0.5%, p<0.0001). For each 1000-foot increase in elevation, there was a corresponding 0.4% average increase in the rate of DVT (moderate R Conclusions: Even after adjustment, H-ELV injuries were associated with 3.8 increased odds of developing a DVT compared with L-ELV injuries. There was a significant positive linear association between DVT and injury elevation, with the rate of DVT increasing with increasing elevation. This finding may suggest the need for enhanced screening or tailored DVT prophylaxis methods at higher elevation trauma centers to improve outcomes. Level of evidence: Level IV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.