ArticlemicroLife2026
The complexity of multiple CRISPR arrays in strains with (co-occurring) CRISPR systems.
Article in microLife, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- An evolutionary approach to predict the orientation of CRISPR arrays.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
CRISPR and their associated Cas proteins provide adaptive immunity in prokaryotes, protecting against invading genetic elements. These systems are categorized into types and are highly diverse. Genomes often harbor multiple CRISPR arrays varying in length and distance from Cas loci. However, the ecological roles of multiple CRISPR arrays and their interactions with multiple Cas loci remain poorly understood. We present a comprehensive analysis of CRISPR systems that uncovers variation between diverse Cas types regarding the occurrence of multiple arrays, the distribution of their lengths and positions relative to Cas loci, and the diversity of their repeat sequences. Some types tend to occur as the sole Cas locus present in the genome, but typically have two or more associated arrays, especially for types I-E and I-F. Multiple Cas types are also common, with some systems showing a preference for specific co-occurrence. Distinct array distributions and orientations around Cas loci indicate substantial differences in functionality and transcriptional behavior among Cas types. Our analysis suggests that arrays with identical repeats in the same genome acquire new spacers at comparable rates, irrespective of their proximity to the Cas locus. Furthermore, repeat similarities indicate that arrays of systems that often co-occur with other systems tend to have more diverse repeats than those mostly appearing alongside solitary systems. Our results indicate that co-occurring Cas-type pairs might not only collaborate in spacer acquisition but also maintain independent and complementary functions and that CRISPR systems distribute their defensive spacer repertoire equally across multiple CRISPR arrays.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.