Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41561365›Full record

ArticleDialogues in health2026

Socio-ecological model: Understanding facilitators and barriers to HIV testing and counseling uptake in sub-Saharan Africa - A systematic review.

Amanda Debuo Der, Elvis Enowbeyang Tarkang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dialogues in health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Amanda Debuo DerDepartment of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, School of Public Health, University of Ghana, Ghana.
Elvis Enowbeyang TarkangSchool of Public Health, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Volta Region, Ghana.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This systematic review examined the facilitators and barriers to HTC uptake among adults in SSA using the socio-ecological model (SEM). Methods: A systematic search of Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus, Sociological Abstracts, PsycINFO and Europe PMC identified 114 HTC uptake studies in SSA from 2010 to 2023 of which 6 met the inclusion criteria. The search followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Results: Individual level facilitators of HTC included high perceived HIV risk, privacy, higher education, and prior testing experience while low HIV knowledge, fear of positive results, stigma, and lack of confidence in self-testing were barriers. Interpersonal facilitators included partner and peer support, and peer normalization of testing, while barriers involved fear of partner reactions, trust concerns, and fear of unintentional disclosure. At the health system-level, facilitators included counseling, positive experiences with providers, and no discrimination while privacy concerns, stigma, and judgmental attitudes of healthcare workers hindered HTC uptake. The community-level barriers included misconceptions and stigma, whereas community-based education improved HTC uptake. At the policy level, cost was a barrier, but availability of self-testing facilitated uptake. The interpersonal factors presented the most significant facilitators (53.3 %), while the policy-level factors were the most significant barriers (57.1 %). Conclusion: HTC uptake in SSA is shaped by intersecting SEM factors. Understanding these influences are essential for designing effective interventions to improve HTC uptake and linkage to care.

Indexed as

AfricaHIV testing and counselingSocio-ecological modelSub-Saharan Africa

Identifiers

PMID41561365
PMCPMC12813316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.