ArticleStructural heart : the journal of the Heart Team2026
Outcomes of Mitral Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair in Patients With Small Mitral Valve Area.
Article in Structural heart : the journal of the Heart Team, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Small Mitral Valve Orifice Area in Mitral Valve Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair: The REPAIR Study.JACC. Advances · 2026Article
- Pushing the Limits of Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair: How Small Can the Mitral Valve Area Go?Structural heart : the journal of the Heart Team · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: A small baseline mitral valve area (MVA) raises concern for iatrogenic mitral stenosis due to increased transmitral pressure gradients (TMPG) after mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER). Outcomes in patients with MVA <4.0 cm² remain limited, as this population has been largely excluded from clinical trials. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 305 consecutive patients who underwent M-TEER (2014-2022). Patients were stratified by baseline MVA (<4.0 cm Results: Of 305 patients, 66 (21.6%) had MVA <4.0 cm². Women were more prevalent in the small MVA group (57.6% vs. 42.7%; p = 0.03). Patients with smaller MVA received fewer clips (1.3 ± 0.07 vs. 1.5 ± 0.04; Conclusions: M-TEER can be safely and effectively performed in patients with baseline MVA <4.0 cm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.