ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
Anticoagulation management in intracerebral hemorrhage patients with deep vein thrombosis: insights from unsupervised machine learning and nomogram analysis.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and internal validation of a nomogram for estimating concurrent superficial vein thrombosis at presentation in patients with lower extremity varicose veins.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- The Association of the Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and the D-dimer-to-Albumin Ratio with Deep Vein Thrombosis in Patients with Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage.International journal of general medicine · 2026Article
- Machine Learning-Based Early Prediction of Lower Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis in the ICU: A Multicenter Study.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a frequent complication in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), increasing the risk of adverse outcomes and mortality. However, standard anticoagulation therapy can lead to hematoma expansion, highlighting the need for reliable and practical risk assessment tools. While unsupervised machine learning has shown promise in patient stratification, its clinical applicability is limited. This study integrates unsupervised machine learning with nomogram analysis to identify risk factors and establish a clinically actionable risk assessment tool. Methods: The study was conducted in two phases. In the retrospective exploratory phase, 191 ICH patients receiving anticoagulation were grouped using K-means and hierarchical clustering. Incidence rates of DVT and adverse events were analyzed to identify key risk factors influencing anticoagulant safety. A nomogram was then constructed to quantify adverse event risk. In the prospective validation phase, 291 patients were stratified into high- and low-risk groups based on nomogram scores. VTE and adverse event rates were compared between groups, with multivariate regression and subgroup analyses performed. Results: Key risk factors identified included admission mRS, GCS, and ADL scores, admission and discharge ICH volume, and admission albumin level. In the validation cohort, the low-risk group had significantly lower VTE (16.9% vs. 65.1%, Conclusion: This study demonstrates that unsupervised machine learning, combined with a nomogram, can effectively stratify risk in ICH patients receiving anticoagulation. The risk assessment tool reliably identifies patients at lower risk of adverse outcomes, supporting safer and more individualized clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.