Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41561335›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025

Anesthesia-related factors in the pathogenesis of postoperative cognitive dysfunction: a mechanistic perspective.

Meng-Ni Qin, Ya-Nan Deng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Meng-Ni QinDepartment of Anesthesiology, Honghui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Ya-Nan DengDepartment of Anesthesiology, Honghui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) is a significant complication resulting from interactions between anesthesia-related neural disturbances and pre-existing vulnerability. This perspective delineates three major mechanisms: neuroinflammatory activation, oxidative mitochondrial injury, and impaired synaptic plasticity. These interconnected pathways collectively disrupt neuronal homeostasis and contribute to cognitive decline. Clinically, anesthetic choice influences risk, with volatile agents showing stronger neurotoxic potential, whereas dexmedetomidine provides anti-inflammatory benefits. Evidence-based strategies-such as processed electroencephalogram-guided titration, regional anesthesia to reduce opioid use, and cerebral oxygenation monitoring-have demonstrated measurable reductions in POCD incidence. Integrating these findings into a two-hit framework highlights anesthesia as a secondary insult superimposed on age-, frailty-, or metabolism-related vulnerability. Diabetes mellitus exemplifies this first-hit state by creating chronic neuroinflammation, mitochondrial dysfunction, and blood-brain barrier impairment that heighten susceptibility to perioperative stress. Future progress requires precision approaches, including genetic and biomarker-based risk stratification and mechanism-targeted neuroprotective therapies. Methodological limitations-such as heterogeneous assessments and underpowered studies-necessitate standardized multicenter trials with harmonized cognitive testing and extended follow-up. This perspective provides an integrated model of POCD pathogenesis and outlines priorities for advancing individualized perioperative neuroprotection.

Indexed as

anesthesiacognitive declineneuroinflammationperspectivepostoperative cognitive dysfunction

Identifiers

PMID41561335
PMCPMC12812579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.