Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41561333›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025

NEDA-3 using cladribine for multiple sclerosis: effectiveness data from a Norwegian hospital.

Nora Berg Bjørnevoll, Karl Bjørnar Alstadhaug

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nora Berg BjørnevollFaculty of Health Sciences at UiT - The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Karl Bjørnar AlstadhaugDepartment of Neurology, Nordland Hospital, Bodø, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cladribine is an immunomodulatory agent used in the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) and, in some countries, for active progressive forms of MS. However, relatively few clinical observational studies have evaluated its effect. Materials and methods: This retrospective cohort study included all patients with multiple sclerosis who were treated with cladribine at Nordland Hospital between April 2018 and September 2024. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of cladribine by assessing No Evidence of Disease Activity (NEDA)-3 over time. Results: A total of 60 patients (62% women), of whom 58 had relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, 1 had radiologically isolated syndrome, and 1 had secondary progressive disease and received at least 1 cyclic treatment. The mean age at the initiation of cladribine was 38.5 ± 11.0 years, and the mean Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) was 2.1 ± 1.3. Two-thirds (65%) of the patients had received other disease-modifying treatment before cladribine. During the study period, eight patients switched or discontinued treatment, seven due to disease activity, two due to self-financed autologous stem cell treatment, one due to a drug overdose, and one for an unclear reason. Compared to patients with evidence of disease activity (EDA), those achieving NEDA-3 after 2 years were older at MS onset ( Conclusion: One in three patients achieved NEDA-3 3 years after starting cladribine, with the best outcomes observed in treatment-naïve patients, while its favorable safety profile and convenient dosing support long-term adherence and disease stability.

Indexed as

cladribineeffectivnessmultiple scleroisNEDA-3survival analaysis

Identifiers

PMID41561333
PMCPMC12812752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.