Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41561319›Full record

ArticleResuscitation plus2026

Intubation during in-hospital cardiac arrest: an instrumental variable analysis.

Mathias J Holmberg, Asger Granfeldt, Lars W Andersen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Resuscitation plus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mathias J HolmbergDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Asger GranfeldtDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Lars W AndersenDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Tracheal intubation is commonly performed during in-hospital cardiac arrest, but the evidence for a survival benefit remains uncertain. Methods: This was an observational study using data from the Get With The Guidelines registry. Adult patients with an in-hospital cardiac arrest between January 2013 and December 2021 were included. Instrumental variable analyses were conducted using two-stage least squares regression in an attempt to account for unmeasured confounding. Two instrumental variables were predefined as (1) tracheal intubation during the previous cardiac arrest and (2) the proportion of intubated cardiac arrest patients within the past year at a given hospital. The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes included return of spontaneous circulation and favorable neurological status. Results: A total of 210,115 cardiac arrests were included. The median age was 67 years, 59 % of patients were male, and 85 % of patients had an initial non-shockable rhythm. Intubation was performed in 85 % of patients. For the first and second instrumental variables, tracheal intubation was associated with absolute risk differences in survival of -11 % (95 % CI, -16 % to -5.6 %) and -12 % (95 % CI, -16 % to -8.2 %), respectively. Similar results were observed for the secondary outcomes. Conclusions: Tracheal intubation during in-hospital cardiac arrest was associated with reduced survival, although point estimates were implausibly large, and the results should be interpreted cautiously. Preference-based instrumental variables may not adequately address confounding in this setting. Randomized clinical trials are needed to inform advanced airway management during in-hospital cardiac arrest.

Indexed as

Airway managementHeart arrestIntubationResuscitation

Identifiers

PMID41561319
PMCPMC12814831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.