ArticleResuscitation plus2026
Intubation during in-hospital cardiac arrest: an instrumental variable analysis.
Article in Resuscitation plus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Tracheal intubation is commonly performed during in-hospital cardiac arrest, but the evidence for a survival benefit remains uncertain. Methods: This was an observational study using data from the Get With The Guidelines registry. Adult patients with an in-hospital cardiac arrest between January 2013 and December 2021 were included. Instrumental variable analyses were conducted using two-stage least squares regression in an attempt to account for unmeasured confounding. Two instrumental variables were predefined as (1) tracheal intubation during the previous cardiac arrest and (2) the proportion of intubated cardiac arrest patients within the past year at a given hospital. The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes included return of spontaneous circulation and favorable neurological status. Results: A total of 210,115 cardiac arrests were included. The median age was 67 years, 59 % of patients were male, and 85 % of patients had an initial non-shockable rhythm. Intubation was performed in 85 % of patients. For the first and second instrumental variables, tracheal intubation was associated with absolute risk differences in survival of -11 % (95 % CI, -16 % to -5.6 %) and -12 % (95 % CI, -16 % to -8.2 %), respectively. Similar results were observed for the secondary outcomes. Conclusions: Tracheal intubation during in-hospital cardiac arrest was associated with reduced survival, although point estimates were implausibly large, and the results should be interpreted cautiously. Preference-based instrumental variables may not adequately address confounding in this setting. Randomized clinical trials are needed to inform advanced airway management during in-hospital cardiac arrest.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.