Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41561318›Full record

ReviewResuscitation plus2026

Wolf Creek XVIII Part 2: optimizing time intervals in cardiac arrest care.

Theresa M Olasveengen, Haruka Takahashi, Rudolph W Koster, Gavin D Perkins, Robert W Neumar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Resuscitation plus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Theresa M OlasveengenAnesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, and Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway.
Haruka TakahashiHealth Services Research & Population Health, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.
Rudolph W KosterAmsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Heart Center, Department of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Gavin D PerkinsWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.
Robert W NeumarDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, and Max Harry Weil Institute for Critical Care Research and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optimizing time intervals in cardiac arrest care was a featured topic at the 50th Anniversary Wolf Creek Conference (Wolf Creek XVIII) hosted by the Max Harry Weil Institute for Critical Care Research and Innovation in Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA on June 19-21, 2025. This narrative review summarizes the presentations and discussion of the topic by invited panelist and conference participants made up of international academic and industry scientists as well as thought leaders in the field of cardiac arrest resuscitation. The proceedings highlighted the limitations of binary proportion-based resuscitation metrics (e.g. "bystander CPR-yes/no") in driving improvements in cardiac arrest outcomes and called for a paradigm shift-placing time intervals to key cardiac arrest interventions and responses to therapy at the center of benchmarking quality improvement and research. In addition to an overview of the current state and vision for the future state, we detail knowledge gaps and barriers to translation, and propose research priorities that include standardizing interval measurement, harmonizing reporting, and validating interval metrics for system performance and proximal outcomes. Making treatment and response intervals core metrics for systems-of-care, registries, and clinical trials could shift the field's focus toward the goal of faster restoration of perfusion resulting in improved survival and better neurologic recovery.

Indexed as

Cardiac arrestCardiopulmonary resuscitationCPRDefibrillationEpinephrineExtracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR)ResuscitationReturn of spontaneous circulationTime intervals

Identifiers

PMID41561318
PMCPMC12814828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.