Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41561315›Full record

ArticleSurgery in practice and science2026

Radioguided occult lesion localisation for wide local excision, excision biopsies and in combination with radioisotope sentinel lymph node localisation (SNOLL) - 10 year experience of a single centre.

Bahar Mirshekar-Syahkal, Haifa Alotaibi, Sendhil Rajan, Mathew Gray, David Newman, Maged Hussien

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgery in practice and science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bahar Mirshekar-SyahkalBreast surgery, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Colney lane, Norwich NR47UY, United Kingdom. University of East Anglia, Norwich UK.
Haifa AlotaibiBreast surgery, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Colney lane, Norwich NR47UY, United Kingdom. University of East Anglia, Norwich UK.
Sendhil RajanBreast surgery, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Colney lane, Norwich NR47UY, United Kingdom. University of East Anglia, Norwich UK.
Mathew GrayBreast surgery, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Colney lane, Norwich NR47UY, United Kingdom. University of East Anglia, Norwich UK.
David NewmanBreast surgery, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Colney lane, Norwich NR47UY, United Kingdom. University of East Anglia, Norwich UK.
Maged HussienBreast surgery, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Colney lane, Norwich NR47UY, United Kingdom. University of East Anglia, Norwich UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Various techniques are used to localise non-palpable breast cancer and identify sentinel lymph nodes (SLN). Seed-based localisations can be expensive, may dislodge and require special intraoperative equipment. We report our experience of using radioguided occult lesion localisation (ROLL) alone and with SLN (SNOLL). Methods: This is a retrospective review of all patients undergoing breast excision procedures using ROLL between January 2008 and 2018. On the morning of surgery or the day before, patients had 10 MBq Technetium 99 m colloid injected into the centre of the breast lesion under ultrasound guidance with a further 10 MBq injected into the periareolar skin if SLN was planned. Surgery was performed with the aid of a gamma probe to detect the radioisotope signal in the breast and axilla and specimen X-rays of the breast excision specimen were performed with cavity shaves considered if appropriate. Results: 1073 ROLL-guided excisions were performed in 1050 patients: 1043 of these were wide local excisions (WLE), which included 11 level two oncoplastic procedures, with the remaining being excision biopsies. 957 of the WLEs were SNOLL procedures. ROLL was successful in 1065 (99.3 %) procedures. Of the eight ROLL failures, three were due to incorrect lesion localisation and two were due to diffuse ROLL signal. SLN biopsy was successful in 955 (99.8 %) of cases. Conclusions: SNOLL/ROLL is a reliable, cheap and easy localisation technique where the marker cannot be dislodged during the procedure. Both localisations are performed on the day of surgery using the same equipment for signal detection in the breast and axilla.

Indexed as

LocalisationNon palpable breast cancerSentinel lymph nodeWide local excision

Identifiers

PMID41561315
PMCPMC12813347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.