ArticleCureus2025
Cefiderocol Elimination During Peritoneal Dialysis: A Short Report.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cefiderocol is a siderophore cephalosporin with potent activity against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens, yet pharmacokinetic data for patients receiving peritoneal dialysis (PD) are lacking. We report the first clinical observation of cefiderocol elimination during PD, complemented by an intra-individual comparison with hemodialysis (HD) and reference measurements from a second patient not receiving dialysis. A 64-year-old man on continuous ambulatory PD received cefiderocol 2 g every eight hours as three-hour infusions. Serial sampling showed serum trough and peak concentrations of 79.8 and 139.9 mg/L. A single PD exchange reduced serum levels by 32% (from 139.9 to 95.6 mg/L) with near-complete equilibration in dialysate (94 mg/L), indicating meaningful peritoneal removal. During subsequent conversion to HD, serum concentrations declined more rapidly, consistent with higher extracorporeal clearance. A second patient with acute-on-chronic kidney injury who did not receive dialysis exhibited the highest concentrations (trough 164.9 mg/L; peak 280.1 mg/L), highlighting the impact of absent extracorporeal elimination. Treatment was clinically successful and well-tolerated in both cases, with no neurotoxicity or other adverse events observed. These findings demonstrate that PD provides moderate but consistent cefiderocol elimination, substantially less efficient than HD, and suggest that therapeutic drug monitoring may help optimize dosing and balance efficacy and safety in PD. Larger studies are warranted to refine dosing recommendations for this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.