ReviewCureus2025
The Role of Esketamine in Reducing Propofol-Related Adverse Events During Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Propofol is commonly used for sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy, but its use is associated with dose-dependent adverse effects. Esketamine, an N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist, may mitigate these risks when used as an adjunct. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing esketamine plus propofol versus propofol alone in adults undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy. We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library up to November 29, 2025. The primary outcome was the incidence of propofol-related cardiorespiratory adverse events (hypotension, respiratory depression, bradycardia). Data were pooled using a random-effects model. Risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2). Six RCTs (n = 1,199 patients) were included for qualitative synthesis. Three RCTs (n = 524) provided data for meta-analysis. The pooled analysis demonstrated that esketamine significantly reduced the risk of propofol-related adverse events (relative risk (RR) = 0.43, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.23-0.82). Heterogeneity was high (I² > 50%). Most studies had a low risk of bias, and sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of the findings. Esketamine appears to mitigate propofol-associated adverse events, including hypotension, bradycardia, and respiratory depression, during gastrointestinal endoscopy. Nevertheless, further well-designed, large-scale RCTs are needed to validate these findings and determine optimal dosing strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.