ArticleCureus2025
Improving Surgical Safety Through Checklist Compliance: Lessons From a Clinical Audit in a Teaching Hospital.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background The World Health Organization (WHO) Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC) is a validated tool to improve perioperative safety and reduce preventable complications. Despite being introduced worldwide, compliance with the SSC remains inconsistent, especially in limited-resource settings. This study aimed to assess compliance with the SSC, identify barriers to its implementation, and evaluate the impact of an educational intervention at Omdurman Teaching Hospital, Omdurman, Sudan. Methods An observational clinical audit was conducted in the Department of Surgery at Omdurman Teaching Hospital between March and April 2025. A total of 100 operations were observed: 50 during the first audit cycle (baseline) and 50 during the second cycle (post-intervention). Data were collected using a structured tool adapted from the WHO SSC, recording whether checklist items were performed and/or verbalized during the Sign-In, Time-Out, and Sign-Out phases. An educational intervention, consisting of departmental seminars, posters, and reminders, was introduced between the two cycles. Staff feedback regarding barriers to SSC compliance was also obtained. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 26 (Released 2018; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA), with results expressed as frequencies and percentages. Results Baseline compliance with the SSC was suboptimal. Sign-In, Time-Out, and Sign-Out were performed in 60%, 52%, and 30% of cases, respectively, during Cycle 1. Following the intervention, compliance improved significantly: Sign-In to 86%, Time-Out to 80%, and Sign-Out to 88%. Documentation improved from 34% to 70%, while patient board completion rose from 28% to 64%. Verbalization of checklist items remained weak (e.g., Sign-Out read aloud: 0% vs. 12%). Staff cited lack of awareness (90%), absence of responsibility (75%), and perceptions of increased workload (60%) as key barriers. Conclusion Implementation of the WHO SSC at Omdurman Teaching Hospital demonstrated measurable improvements in compliance after a simple educational intervention. However, persistent gaps in verbalization and staff perceptions highlight the need for ongoing training, leadership engagement, and cultural change to sustain long-term adherence and strengthen surgical safety in Sudan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.