ArticleCureus2025
Prescribing Patterns and Medication Appropriateness in General Medicine: Evaluation of Adherence to WHO Guidelines at a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital in South Delhi, India.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRational prescribing is vital to ensure patient safety, reduce medication errors, and optimize healthcare resource utilization. Prescription audits serve as essential tools for evaluating and improving prescription practices in clinical settings.
objectivesThe objectives of the study are to assess the prescription patterns and the completeness of prescriptions in the outpatient department of a tertiary care teaching hospital, using the World Health Organization (WHO) core prescribing indicators, and to identify areas for improvement.
methodsA retrospective observational study was conducted by analyzing 300 randomly selected printed prescriptions from the Department of Medicine over six months. Data were extracted on patient demographics, prescription completeness, drug categories, and adherence to WHO prescribing indicators. Descriptive statistics summarized the findings.
resultsAll prescriptions included basic patient and prescriber information; however, only 87 (29%) stated a diagnosis, and 14 (4.7%) used generic drug names. The average number of drugs prescribed per prescription was 6.8 ± 1.7, with 213 (71%) of prescriptions involving polypharmacy (≥3 drugs). Antibiotics were prescribed in 137 (45.7%) of encounters, with complete adherence to the local antibiotic policy observed in 300 (100%) of the prescriptions. Injectable drugs were prescribed in 12 (4%) of the prescriptions. About 183 (61%) of prescribed drugs were from the National List of Essential Medicines, and 243 (81%) were available in the hospital pharmacy. Documentation of treatment duration and dosage schedules was present in 174 (58%) and 231 (77%) of prescriptions, respectively.
conclusionsWhile basic prescription documentation meets standards, significant gaps remain in diagnosis recording, generic prescribing, and reduction of polypharmacy. Regular prescription audits and targeted educational interventions are recommended to enhance rational drug use and patient safety in the hospital.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.