SynthesisFrontiers in nutrition2025
The role of fermented foods in managing food allergies in children and adults: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Health benefits of fermented foods: a strategic roadmap from the PIMENTO initiative.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
28 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Fermented foods are among the oldest foods produced, and several different health benefits are attributed to their consumption even in the absence of concrete clinical evidence. To address this gap, this systematic review focuses on the effects of the consumption of fermented foods on food allergies. Methods: This systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and the relevant European Food Safety Authority guidelines. A systematic search strategy was established and registered in a study protocol in Open Science Framework. Scopus, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library were searched with specific strings targeting human studies focusing on Fermented food and food allergies. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were defined based on the People Intervention Comparison Outcome elements. The Cadima tool was used to perform screening and selection of articles. A standard template was used for data extraction. Risk of bias assessment was performed using the Risk of Bias 2.0 Tool, Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies - of Interventions, or Newcastle-Ottawa Scale protocols. Additionally, a narrative section was written based on the European Food Safety Authority guidelines for the mechanism of action and product characteristics for evidence support. Results: From a total of 558 initial records, 10 studies were finally selected. Fermented foods evaluated were fermented soy products, baked goods, fruit-based beverages, vinegar-treated foods, oat-based drinks, and dairy products (yogurt, cheese). In several studies, a reduced allergenicity was reported that was related to fermentation-mediated hydrolysis of allergenic proteins of gluten or soy. Additional mechanisms were related to anti-allergic immunomodulatory effects or favorable shifts in gut microbiota composition. In one case, fermented food consumption led to aggravation of the allergic response, presumably due to the compounds generated during soy fermentation. Risk of bias assessment revealed that most studies were performed with important methodological limitations. Conclusion: While fermented foods hold promise in reducing food allergenicity and promoting tolerance, current evidence is limited to draw solid conclusions. Rigorous, well-designed human clinical trials, complemented by mechanistic studies Systematic review registration: https://osf.io/hgjaf/10.17605/OSF.IO/HGJAF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.