ReviewFrontiers in digital health2025
Transforming clinical reasoning-the role of AI in supporting human cognitive limitations.
Review in Frontiers in digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Promises and Perils of Clinical Decision Support Artificial Intelligence.The clinical teacher · 2026Article
- Cognitive Tunneling in Obstetrics and Gynecology: A Critical Review of Implications for Clinical Practice and Mitigation Strategies.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Transforming Human-AI Collaboration in Emergency Care: The Role of AI in Adaptive Support Across Diagnostic Reasoning Modes.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026Article
- Evidence-Based Medicine Meets Artificial Intelligence: Reframing Critical Appraisal in Emergency Medicine.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026Article
- Beyond Algorithmic Oversight: Internal Morality of Medicine and Meaningful Human Control in AI-Assisted Care.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- An embodied cognition based model of medical experts' tacit knowledge: structure, hierarchies, and transformation.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- What and when: a Delphi study identifying AI competencies and learning objectives for medical students.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Human-centered digital ecosystem: safeguarding healthcare workers' sleep, ergonomics, and occupational health.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Rethinking AI in clinical decision support: a framework for reciprocal human-AI interaction.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Musculoskeletal surgeons use mixed reasoning rather than pure Bayesian strategies in clinical practice.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clinical reasoning is foundational to medical practice, requiring clinicians to synthesise complex information, recognise patterns, and apply causal reasoning to reach accurate diagnoses and guide patient management. However, human cognition is inherently limited by factors such as limitations in working memory capacity, constraints in cognitive load, a general reliance on heuristics; with an inherent vulnerability to biases including anchoring, availability bias, and premature closure. Cognitive fatigue and cognitive overload, particularly apparent in high-pressure environments, further compromise diagnostic accuracy and efficiency. Artificial intelligence (AI) presents a transformative opportunity to overcome these limitations by supplementing and supporting decision-making. With AI's advanced computational capabilities, these systems can analyse large datasets, detect subtle or atypical patterns, and provide accurate evidence-based diagnoses. Furthermore, by leveraging machine learning and probabilistic modelling, AI reduces dependence on incomplete heuristics and potentially mitigates cognitive biases. It also ensures consistent performance, unaffected by fatigue or information overload. These attributes likely make AI an invaluable tool for enhancing the accuracy and efficiency of diagnostic reasoning. Through a narrative review, this article examines the cognitive limitations inherent in diagnostic reasoning and considers how AI can be positioned as a collaborative partner in addressing them. Drawing on the concept of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.