ReviewFrontiers in physiology2025
A new paradigm in postoperative colorectal cancer surveillance: integrating advanced imaging and multi-omics.
Review in Frontiers in physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond the biopsy: the new era of non-invasive staging and biomarkers in colorectal cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Review
- Pretreatment Staging FDG PET-Derived Radiomic Score Predicts Progression-Free Survival in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Treated with Total Neoadjuvant Therapy.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Watch-and-wait in rectal cancer: A critical appraisal of promise, perils and unresolved contours of organ preservation (Review).Oncology letters · 2026Review
- Metastatic Odyssey: Decoding the Genomic Journey from Primary Colorectal Cancer to Disseminated Disease.Cancers · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Up to one-third of patients with localized colorectal cancer (CRC) relapse after curative-intent resection, as conventional markers like carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and scheduled CT/MRI often fail to detect micro-metastatic disease early. Advanced imaging, particularly radiomics, and liquid biopsy with circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) are emerging as complementary tools to address this challenge. Radiomics extracts high-throughput image features to quantify risk and track response, with reported AUCs often ranging from 0.70 to 0.85. Concurrently, ctDNA has proven to be the strongest postoperative prognostic marker for recurrence in stage II-III CRC, providing surveillance lead times of 3-11 months over conventional methods. The landmark DYNAMIC trial demonstrated that ctDNA-guided adjuvant therapy safely reduced chemotherapy uses without compromising survival. By integrating ctDNA's temporal "signal" with imaging's spatial "localization," clinicians can accelerate the detection of oligometastatic relapse, personalize surveillance, and refine treatment monitoring. This review synthesizes the evidence supporting this integrated approach, outlining the path toward a proactive, precision-based standard of care in postoperative CRC management, while also addressing the key challenges of standardization and clinical validation that must be overcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.