Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41561151›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physiology2025

Enhancing myocardial infarction detection with vectorcardiography: fusion-based comparative analysis of machine learning methods.

Jaroslav Vondrak, Marek Penhaker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jaroslav VondrakFaculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, VSB-Technical University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czechia.
Marek PenhakerFaculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, VSB-Technical University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czechia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Early detection and diagnosis of myocardial infarction (MI) help physicians save lives through timely treatment. Vectorcardiography (VCG) is an alternative to the 12-lead electrocardiography, providing not only characteristic changes in cardiac electrical activity in MI patients but also unique spatial information often overlooked by traditional methods. Despite its potential, comprehensive comparative studies applying machine learning (ML) techniques specifically to VCG data remain limited. Methods: This study proposes a novel VCG processing methodology using a comparative analysis of machine learning-based algorithms for the automated detection of MI patients from VCG recordings, utilizing extracted domain knowledge VCG features that monitor morphological changes in cardiac activity. For this purpose, records from the PTB Diagnostic dataset were used. The extracted domain knowledge dataset of morphological features was then fed into a diverse set of 210 machine learning configurations, including K-nearest neighbor, Support Vector Machine, Discriminant Analysis, Artificial Neural Network, Decision Tree, Random Forest, Naive Bayes, Logistic Regression, and Ensemble Methods. To further improve classification performance, we combined analyzed high-performing models using a stacking ensemble strategy, which integrates multiple base classifiers into a meta-classifier. Results: The stacking-based decision-level fusion achieved high accuracy of 95.55%, sensitivity of 97.70%, specificity of 86.25%, positive predictive value of 96.86%, negative predictive value of 89.61% and f1-score of 97.27%. Conclusion: The results demonstrate that decision-level fusion via stacking improves classification performance and enhances the reliability of MI detection from VCG recordings, supporting cardiologists in decision-making.

Indexed as

domain knowledge features datasetelectrocardiographyensemble learningmeta classifiermyocardial infarctionvectorcardiography

Identifiers

PMID41561151
PMCPMC12813126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.