ReviewFrontiers in network physiology2025
Evaluation of deep learning tools in medical diagnosis and treatment of cancer: research analysis of clinical and randomized clinical trials.
Review in Frontiers in network physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating artificial intelligence and multi-omics data for precision oncology in endometrial cancer: a narrative review.Functional & integrative genomics · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence for Prognostic Modelling and Adaptive Treatment Monitoring in Radiation Oncology.Cureus · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence and machine learning tools have brought a revolution in the healthcare sector. This has allowed healthcare providers, patients, and public to be at pole position -amidst the key consideration and barriers-to attain precision and personalized medicine. Deep Learning (DL) is a branch of machine learning and AI that has become transformative for healthcare and biomedicine, providing the ability to analyze large, complicated data, capture abstract patterns, and present fast and accurate predictions. DL models are based on complex neural networks that emulate biological neural networks. In this paper, our goal is to evaluate DL algorithms in clinical trials stratified per cancer type and present future perspectives on the most promising DL approaches. We systematically reviewed articles on deep learning in cancer diagnostics in studies published in the Pubmed database. The searched literature included two types of articles, clinical trials, and randomized controlled trials. The deep learning algorithms used in the targeted literature are reviewed, and then we evaluated the performance of the algorithms used in disease prediction and prognosis. We aim to highlight the promising DL approaches reported per cancer type. Finally, we present current limitations and potential recommendations in large-scale implementation of deep learning and AI in cancer care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.