ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2026
Circulating angiogenic progenitor cell apoptosis in Post-COVID-19 syndrome.
Article in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cellular endothelial dysfunction in patients recovering from Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) remains poorly understood. This study examined circulating angiogenic progenitor cells (CAC) and mature endothelial cells (CEC) in individuals with persistent symptoms following hospitalization for COVID-19 (PH-PCS) at ≥ 18-months post-infection. Methods: We compared PH-PCS (n = 14) to matched controls without symptomatic COVID-19 (n = 7). Examinations included macro- and microvascular structure and function and the analysis of CAC and CEC using flow cytometry. Results: Estimates indicated somewhat lower apoptotic CAC concentrations (mean difference[md] [95 %CI] = 0.050 cells/µl [0.003, 0.137], p = 0.084) and proportions (% total CAC, 7.7 percentage points (pp) [0.3, 12.9], p = 0.066) in patients compared to controls, though estimates were imprecise. Similar results were observed for apoptotic CEC concentrations (1.202 cells/µl [0.040, 7.518], p = 0.066) and proportions (% total CEC, 2.7 pp [0.2, 23.8], p = 0.048). Live CAC (-7.6 pp [-12.7, -1.1], p = 0.084) and live CEC proportions (-4.9 pp [-23.7, -0.3], p = 0.042) were somewhat enhanced in PH-PCS. Brachial-arterial flow-mediated dilation (baFMD) and retinal vessel imaging parameters showed little evidence for differences between groups, except for maximal arteriolar constriction, where estimates suggested on average higher values in PH-PCS (md [95 %CI] = 1.64 [0.050, 3.63], p = 0.084), but estimates were uncertain. Pooling PH-PCS and controls, correlations were observed between reduced baFMD and both elevated total CEC concentrations (ρ = -0.56, p = 0.038) and decreased apoptotic CAC proportions (ρ = 0.56, p = 0.042). Conclusions: This study suggests the possibility of unbalanced CAC and CEC apoptosis in PH-PCS, but with uncertain magnitude. The findings might inform hypothesis generation for future studies on (cellular) endothelial function in PH-PCS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.