ArticleERJ open research2026
Primary ciliary dyskinesia: a national expert consensus statement on standards of care.
Article in ERJ open research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mapping challenges in the delivery of care for primary ciliary dyskinesia: an international survey on barriers and priorities.ERJ open research · 2026Article
- Airway Clearance and Pediatric Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia: A Clinical Framework for Children and Adolescents.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Xenon-129 magnetic resonance: a paradigm shift, an expensive toy or another tool for the pulmonologist?ERJ open research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) is a genetically and clinically diverse disorder characterised by loss of normal ciliary function leading to chronic oto-sino pulmonary disease, situs abnormalities and subfertility in men and women. There is limited evidence to support robust guidelines on the management of children and adults with PCD; however, there is a clear clinical need to establish a framework of care for the follow-up of these patients. The European Respiratory Society (ERS) has published consensus statements on diagnostic and treatment approaches in children with PCD, and the BEAT-PCD (Better Experimental Approaches to Treat PCD) network provides guidance on infection prevention and control. This is a national consensus statement to outline a set of standards for the provision of specialist care for children and adults with PCD living in England. A national PCD expert panel made up of specialists working in both paediatric and adult UK highly specialist management services, was established to create a consensus statement on the minimum standards of care for PCD. Using a modified Delphi process, consensus to a statement required at least 80% agreement within the PCD expert panel group. Patient organisation representatives were involved in reviewing the statement and have produced an accompanying layperson summary. We present a consensus statement on 15 standards covering provision of pulmonary, ear, nose and throat, and fertility care, screening for situs abnormalities and transition from paediatric to adult care services. It is targeted at clinicians and allied health professionals managing paediatric and adult patients with PCD, patient organisations and patients and their families.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.