Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41561015›Full record

ArticleRSC advances2026

Synthesis and anti-proliferative activity of new E7010 tethered urea congeners as potential tubulin inhibitors and apoptosis inducers.

Shaik Taj, Ganga Reddy Velma, Srinivasa Reddy Telukutla, Satyaveni Malasala, Anjali Sharma, Irfan Khan, Mohd Adil Shareef, Suresh K Bhargava, Magdalena Plebanski, Bathini Nagendra Babu and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RSC advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Shaik TajAcademy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), CSIR-Human Resource Development Centre (CSIR-HRDC) Campus Ghaziabad 201 002 Uttar Pradesh India.
Ganga Reddy VelmaDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, University of Arizona Tucson 85721 AZ USA velmagangareddy47@gmail.com vgreddy@arizona.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5054-2519
Srinivasa Reddy TelukutlaCentre for Advanced Materials & Industrial Chemistry (CAMIC), School of Science, RMIT University GPO Box 2476 Melbourne 3001 Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2806-4300
Satyaveni MalasalaDepartment of Anatomy & Cell Biology, The Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University Greenville NC USA.
Anjali SharmaGuru Gobind Singh College of Pharmacy Yamunanagar (135001) Haryana India.
Irfan KhanAcademy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), CSIR-Human Resource Development Centre (CSIR-HRDC) Campus Ghaziabad 201 002 Uttar Pradesh India.
Mohd Adil ShareefAcademy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), CSIR-Human Resource Development Centre (CSIR-HRDC) Campus Ghaziabad 201 002 Uttar Pradesh India.
Suresh K BhargavaCentre for Advanced Materials & Industrial Chemistry (CAMIC), School of Science, RMIT University GPO Box 2476 Melbourne 3001 Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3127-8166
Magdalena PlebanskiSchool of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University Melbourne 3083 Australia.
Bathini Nagendra BabuAcademy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), CSIR-Human Resource Development Centre (CSIR-HRDC) Campus Ghaziabad 201 002 Uttar Pradesh India.
Ahmed KamalAcademy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), CSIR-Human Resource Development Centre (CSIR-HRDC) Campus Ghaziabad 201 002 Uttar Pradesh India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4107-1775

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A series of twenty-four 1-phenyl-3-(2-phenylpyridin-3-yl)urea congeners (6a-x) have been designed and synthesized. All these compounds were evaluated for their anti-cancer activity against four human cancer cell lines, including prostate cancer (DU-145), lung cancer (A549), cervical cancer (HeLa) and breast cancer (MDA-MB-231). Compound 6q emerged as the most potent in the series, showing consistently strong cytotoxicity against all tested cell lines, with IC50 values ranging from 2.03 to 8.14 µM. Further investigation into the mechanism of action of compound 6q revealed it can arrest cell cycle progression at the G2/M phase. Immunocytochemistry studies showed a notable disruption of microtubule structure in cells treated with 6q. Molecular docking studies provided strong evidence that compound 6q works by binding to the colchicine binding site of β-tubulin, with sequential hydrophilic and hydrophobic interactions. Additionally, the effects of 6q on cell migration and its ability to induce apoptosis in A549 cells were examined using nuclear and mitochondrial staining techniques.

Identifiers

PMID41561015
PMCPMC12814937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.