ArticleJournal of experimental orthopaedics2026
Robotic-assisted restricted kinematic alignment in total knee arthroplasty: A multicenter retrospective assessment of coronal phenotypes and early postoperative outcomes.
Article in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Impact of coronal plane alignment of knee phenotype alteration on short-term effectiveness in robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2026Article
- Robotic-assisted restricted kinematic alignment in total knee arthroplasty: A multicenter retrospective assessment of coronal phenotypes and early postoperative outcomes.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) classification enables phenotype-based total knee arthroplasty (TKA), but its application in robotic-assisted TKA (RATKA) remains underexplored. We aim to describe the distribution of CPAK phenotypes in patients undergoing RATKA using a restricted kinematic alignment (rKA) protocol, evaluate alignment correction within rKA boundaries and report early postoperative functional outcomes. We hypothesized that RATKA would achieve alignment targets within the rKA range while demonstrating expected postoperative functional recovery. Methods: This multicenter retrospective study included 200 patients with primary knee osteoarthritis between June and November 2024 at five high-volume centres. All procedures followed a rKA protocol, with target correction within ±3° of constitutional alignment. CPAK distribution, demographic variations, achieved alignment and early postoperative functional outcomes measured by the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) were analysed. Results: The cohort (mean age 62.9 years; 60.5% female) showed preoperative arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle of -5.8° ± 4.6° and joint line obliquity of 173.2° ± 4.1°, predominantly varus (71.5% Type I). Type I alignment was more frequent in males (73.4%), females (70.2%) and those aged >61 years. Of the 71.5% CPAK Type I, 63.5% remained Type I with correction within 0° ± 3°, while 8% were corrected to Type II. All achieved alignment within rKA limits (mean postoperative hip-knee-ankle 173.0° ± 3.2°). Mean postoperative lateral distal femoral angle and medial proximal tibial angle were 85.1° and 87.7°, respectively. Significant improvements were observed in KOOS (80.9 ± 2.3 vs. 40.6 ± 3.5, Conclusion: RATKA performed with a rKA strategy, achieved postoperative alignment within planned rKA limits across CPAK phenotypes. Early functional outcomes at 6 months were satisfactory and consistent with expected postoperative recovery following TKA; however, in the absence of a comparator group, these improvements cannot be attributed solely to the robotic platform or alignment strategy. Level of Evidence: Level II, retrospective study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.