ArticleJournal of experimental orthopaedics2026
Biomechanical comparison of a new minimally invasive technique versus conventional plating for the treatment of open book symphyseal injuries in osteoporotic human pelvises.
Article in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Augmented stabilization of a rare geriatric "open book"-injury, using a cement augmented internal fixator - a case report.Trauma case reports · 2026Article
- Biomechanical comparison of a new minimally invasive technique versus conventional plating for the treatment of open book symphyseal injuries in osteoporotic human pelvises.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Traumatic open book injuries of the pubic symphysis require stable fixation while minimizing surgical morbidity. Traditional symphyseal plating is associated with complications such as implant failure and infections. This study aims to evaluate the biomechanical performance of a novel minimally invasive technique using an internal fixator (IF) compared to conventional plating (symphyseal locking dynamic compression plate [SLDCP]) in human cadaveric pelvises. Methods: Ten human cadaveric pelvises were assigned to two groups ( Results: At key loading stages (400 and 600 N), the IF group demonstrated significantly higher intrasymphyseal compression forces (IF 61.78 ± 31.98 N vs. SLDCP 15.98 ± 8.2 N at 400 N and IF 42.82 ± 25.2 N vs. SLDCP 9.42 ± 5.81 N at 600 N) and larger contact areas (IF 453 ± 137.6 mm Conclusion: The proposed technique using an internal fixator provided superior biomechanical stability compared to standard plating, offering a promising minimally invasive alternative for managing open book injuries. The technique facilitates uniform force transmission and improved contact conditions, which may enhance healing and reduce complications. Level of Evidence: N/A.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.